Let’s start with one of the forms you developed in Lesson 1: Taking pictures + listening to the forest. You described it as repeatedly returning to a small area of forest, taking photographs, listening, and observing how your gaze changes over time. Now imagine positioning exactly the same activity in four different ways.
as a healing experience
A slow photographic practice in nature for reconnecting with yourself, reducing stress, and developing greater inner presence.
as personal development
A process using repeated observation and photography to become more conscious of habitual ways of seeing and relating to the environment.
as immersive multisensory experience
A guided encounter with forest, sound, silence, photography, duration, and attention.
as artistic research / performance
A repeated photographic action investigating how perception changes through return, duration, listening, and the accumulation of images.
The activity could remain almost identical. But everything around it changes. Who becomes interested. What language you use. Where it can happen. Who might invite you. What participants expect. What partners make sense. What funding you might approach. How much it could cost. Even what people believe they are coming for. This is positioning.
positioning is a choice There is no objectively correct position hiding inside the work. You choose. And that choice depends partly on what you want. You could position the forest work as healing. But perhaps you have absolutely no interest in working in the wellness field. Then it would be a bad position for you, even if the activity could legitimately be described that way. You could position your repeated-place photography course as personal development. Perhaps participants would indeed learn something about themselves. But if what interests you is photographic language, positioning it around self-development could attract people looking for something you do not actually want to provide. The opposite can happen too. Perhaps you want to work with artists developing their visual language, but you describe the course simply as: Photography course in nature. You may attract people looking for camera technique, composition, or landscape photography. The work is not badly designed. The position is unclear. And when positioning is unclear, communication starts compensating. You explain more. You add paragraphs. You try to make every nuance visible. You clarify what you meant. You justify. This is particularly relevant to something you told me during our conversation: that you can develop and densify ideas very easily, but shortening and summarizing feels much harder. Positioning can help with this. Because you do not need to communicate the whole complexity every time. First you decide: Which side of the work am I putting forward here? Then communication becomes selection rather than reduction.
positioning determines what follows Imagine we position your forest work as artistic research. Then later we might naturally ask: Where could artistic research circulate? Residencies? Photobook contexts? Exhibitions? Artist-run spaces? Research programs? We might communicate through images, process notes, documentation, publications. We might speak about: repetition, perception, listening, duration, photographic language. Now position exactly the same work as a wellbeing retreat. Suddenly we are asking completely different questions. What happens to participants? How long do they stay? How do they feel afterward? What kind of accommodation is needed? Who facilitates? What kind of safety and care is offered? How much do participants pay? The work enters another economy. Another audience. Another language. Another ethical contract. This is why positioning comes early in Condition Building. Before pricing. Before place. Before audience. Before promotion. Because all of those decisions depend on what you have decided the work is in relation to the world around it.